Contact GEO Guide

Use this page to understand how to send feedback about GEO content, tool behavior, source suggestions, corrections, and partnership ideas.

Updated Language: English 3 min read GEO guide
Editorial trust

Written and reviewed by MaynorAI团队

Every page is maintained as a practical GEO reference: content is updated during site releases, tool logic is documented, and methodology notes explain how recommendations are selected.

Author
MaynorAI团队
Reviewer
MaynorAI团队
Last updated
Maintained by

GEO Guide is maintained by MaynorAI团队

#

GEO Guide is maintained by MaynorAI团队. The site focuses on Generative Engine Optimization, AI citation monitoring, structured data, content refresh workflows, and technical SEO. We prioritize factual errors, broken links, tool issues, source suggestions, and readability improvements.

Public contact

Public email for feedback and corrections

#

If you need to send a correction, source suggestion, partnership idea, or site issue, email bgnwd15@gmail.com. We prioritize factual errors, broken links, and readability fixes.

Public feedback address: bgnwd15@gmail.com
Feedback scope

What you can send

#

Corrections

Report errors in definitions, steps, source links, platform rules, or update notes.

Tool issues

Report unexpected behavior in checklist, schema, search, citation tracking, or other browser-based tools.

Cases and sources

Suggest public cases, official documentation, research reports, or verifiable data sources.

Partnerships

Suggest editorial partnerships, case studies, or resource links, without any guarantee of placement.

Transparency

Commercial relationships do not override editorial judgment

#

GEO Guide does not guarantee search rankings, AI citations, or advertising revenue. Any partnership idea should be relevant to GEO, useful for readers, and should not require hidden sponsorship, fabricated experience, or unverifiable claims.

Before using AdSense, affiliate links, or other monetization, the site should keep content verifiable, pages accessible, and privacy disclosures transparent.
Helpful context

Include these details when sending feedback

#
  • The page URL and the issue you found.
  • The exact sentence, data point, link, or tool step that needs review.
  • A publicly verifiable source link or screenshot note.
  • For partnerships, describe the topic, public page, and expected format.
Processing order

How we handle incoming feedback

#
  • We prioritize factual errors, broken links, tool issues, and page structure problems that affect reading.
  • Next we handle case additions, source replacements, FAQ expansion, and small wording improvements.
  • Partnership ideas are considered only when they are topic-relevant, useful to readers, and do not hide the commercial relationship.
Best format

The fastest way to get a useful response

#
What to sendWhy it helpsExample
Page URLLets us jump directly to the problem./en/methodology/
Exact issueReduces guesswork and follow-up.The third FAQ answer is outdated.
Source or screenshotShows what should change.A Google help page or a visible screenshot.
Expected outcomeClarifies whether this is a correction, UX fix, or content addition.Update the definition, not just the wording.
Not covered

What this page does not provide

#

Account support

AdSense publisher accounts, payment issues, approval status, and backend permissions belong to Google or the relevant platform.

Ranking promises

This site does not promise keyword rankings, AI citation placement, or ad revenue outcomes.

Sensitive data

Do not send passwords, verification codes, API keys, login cookies, or other private information.

Page review

Who maintains this page

This page is maintained as an editorial and tool reference, with visible update dates, source links where available, and a correction path for factual issues.

Author and reviewer

MaynorAI团队 maintains the content, examples, and tool behavior for GEO Guide.

Review method

Recommendations are checked against page purpose, source quality, crawler access, schema consistency, and user-facing usefulness.

Corrections

If a definition, workflow, source note, or tool output looks outdated, send the URL and section link so it can be reviewed.